thehatfox@lemmy.world to Selfhosted@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agoICANN approves use of .internal domain for your networkwww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square17fedilinkarrow-up13arrow-down10
arrow-up13arrow-down1external-linkICANN approves use of .internal domain for your networkwww.theregister.comthehatfox@lemmy.world to Selfhosted@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square17fedilink
minus-squarer00ty@kbin.lifelinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·3 months agoSorry. I chose .local and I’m sticking to it.
minus-squareEnderMB@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 months agoI switched from .local to .honk and I’m never looking back.
minus-squaredhtseany@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down1·3 months agoI still haven’t heard a convincing argument to not use .local and I see no reason to stop.
minus-squareSirEDCaLot@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 months agoMainly conflicts with mDNS. However it’s shitty IMHO that the mDNS spec snarfed a domain already in widespread use, should have used .mDNS or similar.
Sorry. I chose .local and I’m sticking to it.
I switched from .local to .honk and I’m never looking back.
Fucking GENIUS.
I don’t get it.
I still haven’t heard a convincing argument to not use .local and I see no reason to stop.
Mainly conflicts with mDNS. However it’s shitty IMHO that the mDNS spec snarfed a domain already in widespread use, should have used .mDNS or similar.