3 years is not that much unless the user doesn’t mind changing phones rather often and beating up a phone in such a short time is just a massive skill issue tbh.
Well if you recommend getting an older phone because it’s cheaper, GrapheneOS support may be a concern. Also I think a phone usually can last for 7 years with 1 battery replacement, good ambient temperature and careful use.
Well if the support ends, GrapheneOS support ends too. That’s why more years of support is important here.
I only know 2 good providers: Proton and Tuta.
Didn’t Signal update their protocol to make it post-quantum?
EU countries are going full on fighting privacy now.
What do you think of all this?
Is it a rhetorical question?
Almost every not privacy respecting website uses Google and Firebase analytics. I think it’s common in apps too. The app really can be a pretty useless whistleblower.
Never heard of it. Imo such a service should’ve been covered by at least some content creators if it was good (unless it’s very new). Be careful.
I believe you can stop it by turning off a feature called “fast startup” or something like that.
I’m on Librewolf but looking for an alternative now because it runs very poorly on my 10 years old machine.
It has been falsely claimed that the measure undertaken by MCMC is a draconian measure. We reiterate that Malaysia’s implementation is for the protection of vulnerable groups from harmful online content.
You don’t need to ban privacy reapecting DNS services to ban specific websites. It’s made just for spying.
There’s no file system in existence that can handle a text file large enough to include all reasons why people care about privacy.
The official Telegram client has integrations with some proprietary stuff like Google Maps and probably Google Translate? Another client can help with that. It won’t help with privacy of Telegram itself though.
Maybe it added telemetry instead of going proprietary. I don’t exactly remember what happened. I saw news about it on Lemmy but my client doesn’t support search so I can’t find it now easily.
I think the changes happened after Debian 12 was released so it might just have the last open-source version in the repo. And someone made a fork immediately so it could be that too.
Here I meant that their previous attempts were less shady, even though the intentions were suspicious. Now the methods of getting this law passed are getting suspicious too.
But there should at least be a way to prohibit them to share the data with third parties.