They only apply to games from Japan. This is the Japanese patent system.

“Open Source” is mostly the right term. AI isn’t code, so there’s no source code to open up. If you provide the dataset you trained off of, and open up the code used to train the model, that’s pretty close.

Otherwise, we need to consider “open weights” and “free use” to be more accurate terms.

For example, ChatGPT 3+ in undeniably closed/proprietary. You can’t download the model and run it on your own hardware. The dataset used to train it is a trade secret. You have to agree to all of OpenAI’s terms to use it.

LLaMa is way more open. The dataset is largely known (though no public master copy exists). The code used to train is open source. You can download the model for local use, and train new models based off of the weights of the base model. The license allows all of this.

It’s just not a 1:1 equivalent to open source software. It’s basically the equivalent of royalty free media, but with big collections of conceptual weights.

100PB on i2p is a funny idea, but it’s not necessarily a bad one.

There is no CPU that is ever going to be supported for 10 years for a consumer application. ARM CPUs today are 20x faster than they were 10 years ago, and the ARM/RISC-V chips a decade from now will likely be 10-20x faster than today.

Regardless, the Kryo 670 CPU in the Fairphone 5 is already 3.5 years old, and it’s not super special, it’s just a semi-custom Snapdragon SoC. Consider that 4G LTE launched 13 years ago in the USA, and in 10 years that Kryo chip in the FP5 will be older than that. Could you handle the performance of your last 3G phone today?

Eh, mini-PCs weren’t designed for that. Just buy an OpenWRT compatible router, or a router designed for OpenWRT like the ones from Turris. It’s better to have hardware designed for this kind of application.

Android APK shipping this weekend

Source first. I ain’t touching an APK without seeing code.

Nothing related to Loops on the Pixelfed GitHub yet.

The article does link to that URL behind the line “the first test flight”, but that seems erroneous. This story actually seems to be based on this Chinese press release: https://www.spacetransportation.com.cn/news/info/22.html

But it also seems like there’s some confusion between an “aircraft test” and a “test flight”. I’m not convinced this thing has ever flown.

On one hand, I totally understand that if technical and regulatory issues prevent certain phones from being able to call emergency services, cutting those phones off is a matter of public safety. You don’t want people learning that their phones can’t call emergency services when a loved one is having a heart attack or something.

But this seems like a decision that is pretty toxic to tourism and international business. If I ever visit Australia, am I going to need to buy a phone when I get there? It doesn’t seem wise to make your cell network work all that differently from the rest of the world when cell phones are supposed to work seamlessly across borders.

But this is Lemmy. If there’s a choice between honesty and blaming capitalism, Lemmy users will always blame capitalism.

.world isn’t a ccTLD, it is a gTLD.

The only feedback you deserve is this:

Creating a brand new account and coming to a largely left-wing, anti-corpo network and subcommunity that explicitly states that it is for posting tech related news and articles to promote yet another soulless AI startup is so far away from the ethos of this community that everyone who sees your post is now actively rooting on you to fail.

My advice to you is this: shut down your dumb AI grift, get a real job, delete your Lemmy account, and don’t come back till you can behave.

Mullvad’s Linux client is a nightmare. I just use the Wireguard config file so I can choose how the rest of the network stack should behave.

And an infinite amount of time.

This “rebuttal” is forced contrarianism. It’s embarrassing.

A thought experiment has rules, you can’t just change them and say the experiment doesn’t make sense…

How is the infinite monkey theorum “misleading”. It’s got “infinite” in the name. If you’re applying constraints based on the size or age of the universe, you are fundamentally misunderstanding the thought experiment.

On Android apps connected with a Google account, “Can read, send, and delete emails” scares the shit out of me.

Oh no, I’ll have to slightly lift a tiny box on my desk several times a year!

pumping out all the water

lmao, what? Water is like the ultimate renewable resource.

It’s crazy to me that AI companies are spinning up their own nuclear power plants to train AI, green energy is flourishing better than any projection a decade ago said it would, and AI critics are now upset that datacenters use evaporative cooling…

That’s not true at all. Apple likes minimalism, and putting ports and buttons where you can’t see them adds to the aesthetic.

When these scams first started featuring Musk, it was clear that he was a common lead because of his wealth. Pretty much just “Get rich quick, and be rich like [insert rich guy here]”. I’ve seen scams in the past with Buffet, Gates, or Bezos on it before, because the kind of people who fall for a get-rich-quick scam are the kinds of people who idolize wealth.

But now it seems that Musk fans are a uniquely exploitable group. They are easily fooled by wild claims, and quickly subscribe to magical thinking. At this point, they’re just low-hanging fruit.

The plan this time is to build not just a different interface for a browser, but a different kind of browser entirely — one that is much more proactive, more powerful, more AI-centric, more in line with that original vision.

lol